by elaynab
Concern by 卍 Heil Buddha 卍: Am I just a 16-year outdated brat (pretty long/rant considerably)?
My mother and I don’t have a quite very good connection. All of a unexpected, she has taken an desire in my existence, schooling-smart in any case.
We had been at Barnes and Noble and she asked me why I did not demonstrate her my report card. I informed her it was simply because she never ever questioned. Then she asks how she was intended to know report playing cards have been out. And I informed her she should have questioned. It seems pretty affordable to me.
And then she desires to play psychologist with me expressing shit like, “You didn’t display us your report card simply because you want to go the Renaissance Fair.” Um, no. She failed to inquire. If she cared so considerably she should have questioned. Granted, this is a female who never ever went to any school connected events, like when your little one will get that piece of paper that says they have graduated fifth grade, and so on.
So now, I have been in faculty for ten-eleven years, and NOW she wants to take an desire in my schooling/existence.
So to keep on topic, some of the issues she has explained these previous handful of days have genuinely produced me want to smack the shit out of her. But I never. I maintain my tongue and let her consider whatsoever the fuck she needs.
I virtually variety of snapped at her earlier nowadays. This was what occurred:
Me conversing to my grandmother: He still hasn’t questioned his mother.
Grandmother: Oh yeah.
Her: Questioned his mother what?
Gm: If he could occur above on Friday.
Her: I do not think that will be going on anytime before long.
Me: Why?
Her: Oh, she hears that, but not when I explained something the other day at this identical level.
Me: What did you say?
Her: Selective memory, I see.
Me (I got p.o’d so I yelled): I am NOT A FREAKING MINDREADER! (Then I stormed off even though mumbling, “She’s fucking bothersome.” She almost certainly listened to. I clearly did not treatment at the instant.)
Some of the things she suggests make me so freaking mad. Like, when we ended up in the auto collectively she explained, “Now, assure me you is not going to act like an evil bitch right after right now.”
WHAT Sort OF Mom Phone calls HER Possess DAUGHTER A BITCH? At minimum to her confront. Or how if I never do one thing she’ll say, “Oh. Are you on your period? Since you’re performing like a bitch.”
She thinks she is aware of everything. Then again, most mothers these days act like that.
The ***** in the last paragraph is “b*tch.”
I do not curse in entrance of her. Today was the 1st time.
Best answer:
Solution by Ashley
No, your a brat who functions ten.
P.S … If you believe your previous ample to curse in public in entrance of your mother, than your mother has the right to be a potty mouth like you.
Edit: It doesn’t make a difference hun, you nevertheless cursed. Your mother cares about your training and you could treatment significantly less about that. That is what makes you a brat. My mother would have whooped my A*S for that. You received it lucky.
Give your answer to this issue underneath!
]]>the jury system was invented in medieval england. in a time the authorities represented the king.
so obviously it was the best way to make sure the law system was not just another way for the king to enforce his power. when the founding father created the news judicial system they where very afraid the republic will end up the republic their ancestors created in England after the english civil war. so they took great measures restrict the govorments power, so they wouldn’t have another Cromwell. America has 200 years of free democratic history since then. and today most people don’t view the government as an external ruling force. but as a the people representation.
there for it seems awfully primitive to have uneducated folks as juries deciding in complicated manners that are nothing like what juries had to confront 200 years ago. isn’t time to have professional juries who would be educated in law, rather then stupid hillbillies that can vote a person guilty of murder because they didn’t like the way he dresses.
civil_av8r? why
a professional jury wouldn’t care about politics… a civil jury might
Best answer:
Answer by Ray J
Berry much so.
What do you think? Answer below!
]]>
by The Library of Congress
Question by The One: hey everyone just wanted to get your take on this shroud of turin discovery?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/eu_italy_shroud_of_turin
“She asserts the words include the name “Jesus Nazarene” in Greek, proving the text could not be of medieval origin because no Christian at the time, even a forger, would have labeled Jesus a Nazarene without referring to his divinity.”
“The shroud bears the figure of a crucified man, complete with blood seeping out of nailed hands and feet, and believers say Christ’s image was recorded on the linen fibers at the time of his resurrection.”
are you kidding? They show blood seeping out of his hands?
Best answer:
Answer by Searcher 5.0
I think this “discovery”, just as any other modern day science “discovery”, has an agenda behind it.
Science has moved from finding evidence and creating a hypothesis for it, to creating a hypothesis and searching for a evidence that will confirm it. This isn’t just for this religious discovery, it applies to all science today. It has to do with how scientist are funded now…there is no money in observation and making discoveries first and then working to explain them. You now get money by making a claim with no evidence, then someone who agrees with your claim gives you money to find evidence.
Modern science is broken.
Add your own answer in the comments!
]]>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/eu_italy_shroud_of_turin
“She asserts the terms include the name “Jesus Nazarene” in Greek, proving the text could not be of medieval origin due to the fact no Christian at the time, even a forger, would have labeled Jesus a Nazarene with no referring to his divinity.”
“The shroud bears the determine of a crucified male, complete with blood seeping out of nailed fingers and ft, and believers say Christ’s picture was recorded on the linen fibers at the time of his resurrection.”
are you kidding? They show blood seeping out of his fingers?
Finest answer:
Solution by Searcher five.
I assume this “discovery”, just as any other contemporary day science “discovery”, has an agenda driving it.
Science has moved from discovering evidence and generating a speculation for it, to creating a speculation and searching for a data that will affirm it. This isn’t just for this spiritual discovery, it applies to all science these days. It has to do with how scientist are funded now…there is no income in observation and producing discoveries first and then doing work to make clear them. You now get cash by making a state with no evidence, then someone who agrees with your declare offers you cash to find data.
Present day science is damaged.
Give your reply to this question beneath!
]]>
by neate photos
Question by Divine Truth: Jehovah’s Witnesses and others, why just now the Pope is starting to fight secularism and preach Christianity?
By NICOLE WINFIELD, Associated Press Writer Nicole Winfield, Associated Press Writer – Wed Jun 30, 5:04 pm ET
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100630/ap_on_re_eu/eu_vatican_shakeup
VATICAN CITY – Preoccupied for months by the clerical sex abuse scandal, the pope on Wednesday shuffled the Vatican bureaucracy before heading off on vacation. His most significant appointment: the head of a new office designed to fight secularism in the West.
Pope Benedict XVI tapped a trusted Italian, Monsignor Rino Fisichella, to head the Pontifical Council for Promoting the New Evangelization, a new Vatican department designed to reinvigorate Christianity in the parts of the world where it is falling by the wayside.
Benedict has made rekindling the faith in Europe a priority of his papacy, and the appointment of Fisichella served as a tacit acknowledgment that his efforts to date needed more focus and heft.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition
Inquisition movements
Historians distinguish four different manifestations of the Inquisition:
the Medieval Inquisition (1184–1230s)
the Spanish Inquisition (1478–1834)
the Portuguese Inquisition (1536–1821)
the Roman Inquisition (1542 – c. 1860 )
Because of its objective — combating heresy — the Inquisition had jurisdiction only over baptised members of the Church (which, however, encompassed the vast majority of the population in Catholic countries). Secular courts could still try non-Christians for blasphemy. (Most witch trials went through secular courts.)
The Vatican bureaucracy used the secular courts to back their not theocratic Inquisition, why? The theocratic way is different, “Brothers, even though a man takes some false step before he is aware of it, YOU who have spiritual qualifications try to readjust such a man in a spirit of mildness, as you each keep an eye on yourself, for fear you also may be tempted.” (Galatians 6:1) That is Christianity in genuine action secular bureaucracy can be shamefully unkind and mean! Jehovah’s Witnesses and myself personally have seen this still is true today, Secular courts could still try non-Christians for blasphemy. [by their secular bureaucracy thinking] (Most witch trials went through secular courts.) Is secular bureaucracy church thinking still in secular courts today? Try to live a true theocratic godly life like JW’s try hard to do and you will notice secular bureaucracy church thinking still in secular courts today! A true church and state blasphemy against golden rule theocratic godly life! So might the Pope need a real clue what theocratic godly life really means once off his secular bureaucracy church vacation? Is that not what secular business do? Did Jesus take a vacation off from the love of his Father Jehovah or the love of the people? Should anyone take a vacation from that needed love of all and God?
Journey said, “I don’t suppose any Jehovah takes a vacation.” Yes they do and many will take that time off and use it toward helping more good hearted people to know how to love Jehovah and their fellow humankind as deep as they do. But no Jehovah’s Witness will take a vaction from being a Jehovah’s Witnesses as if it was a secular business like so many religious leaders do. They are treating it like a secular bureaucracy church money business if they do that. And if they treat it like a secular business will they in time have to pay taxes and back taxes for all the years in business? The Bibles says the United Nations will be given power by the people to do something like that in due time! Can you see that coming?
Reminder from: divine truth’s Calendar
Title: District Conventions for 2010
Went on June 25, 26, 27 2010 to Salem
Book of Jeremiah page 182 a clue!
Jeremiah said “I Cannot Keep Silent”
We cannot as well!
Be BOLD and tell the divine truth!
Remain Close to Jehovah!
At the time I put the reminder up I was not sure which one I would be able to get to. But a brother came back from NY&NM and I went with him.
It worked out so well, thank you Jehovah! Something near that worked out 10 years ago as well! And other times too! If we want to be there Jehovah knows just how to get us there! Even if we lost all!:)
Date: Friday July 2, 2010
Time: 8:00 am – 9:00 am
Notes: Jehovah’s Witnesses District Conventions for 2010 in Oregon/English/Salem & Portland
Oregon State Fair & Expo Center Pavilion
2330 17th St. NE
Salem OR 97310
June 18, 2010
June 25, 2010
July 2, 2010
Veterans Memorial Coliseum Arena
One Center Ct.
Portland OR 97227 May 28,2010July 2, 2010
Best answer:
Answer by Tough Guy
Atheists, can I borrow five dollars?
I need to buy a mini Bible made in Dane Cook’s bible factory.
Give your answer to this question below!
]]>where can i find knife throwing lessons this is a medieval knife and i wanna learn to throw it please no bullshit answers i need serious answers here because i really want to learn the skill like give me URLs
well she gave me a website but i got confused it was part of that sca so thanks i geuss but ima wait for some more answers
Best answer:
Answer by JKD Man
Assuming the guy who sells them offers no instruction, I bet you could look up someone in your local Society for Creative Anachronism and they would know a teacher.
Aside from that, there’s always YouTube!
Give your answer to this question below!
]]>
by peterjr1961
Question by dumdum: Isn’t it scary that the UN can just alter the IPCC’s scientific findings and many don’t even notice?
The IPCC’s original chart on temperature change originally showed (in the late 90s) that the Medieval Warm Period saw temperatures that were a lot warmer than today, the Modern Era.
http://www.fcpp.org/images/publications/MedievalWarmPeriod500.jpg
This is how the chart looks today minus the Medieval Warm Period–changing history & science and making is look like temperatures are only now climbing–big difference, isn’t it?
http://www.greencampus.harvard.edu/ggi/images/IPCC-climate-change-chart.gif
Some more info on the changes/alterations made to science!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1533290/Climate-chaos-Don’t-believe-it.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MWP_and_LIA_in_IPCC_reports
“First, the UN implies that carbon dioxide ended the last four ice ages. It displays two 450,000-year graphs: a sawtooth curve of temperature and a sawtooth of airborne CO2 that’s scaled to look similar. Usually, similar curves are superimposed for comparison. The UN didn’t do that. If it had, the truth would have shown: the changes in temperature preceded the changes in CO2 levels.
Next, the UN abolished the medieval warm period (the global warming at the end of the First Millennium AD). In 1995, David Deming, a geoscientist at the University of Oklahoma, had written an article reconstructing 150 years of North American temperatures from borehole data. He later wrote: “With the publication of the article in Science, I gained significant credibility in the community of scientists working on climate change. They thought I was one of them, someone who would pervert science in the service of social and political causes. One of them let his guard down. A major person working in the area of climate change and global warming sent me an astonishing email that said: ‘We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.’ ”
Bob: So you’re just going to deny the facts even though wiki (a site you trust) even confirms that this was the old IPCC chart?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ipcc7.1-mann-moberg.png
Bob: You’re right–after a lot of criticism from scientists, they changed their chart again four years later in 2005 so that it doesn’t look like the “hockey stick” chart that they were trying to use by getting rid of the Medieval Warm Period. How many times should they be allowed to change the data?
This is an interesting chart, too.
http://longrangeweather.com/images/GTEMPS.gif
Ken: It’s not just England, it’s global temperatures.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MWP_and_LIA_in_IPCC_reports
So the data from the 70s, 80s, and even the 90s is now “wrong”–how do we know what’s right? Maybe many climatologists/scientist are right when they say we still don’t know enough about long term climate and temperature changes to make any definite conclusions (that the AGW scientists are making).
littlerobbergirl: It’s not the site that matters–it’s the same chart that’s mentioned in the wikipedia entry one the changing IPCC charts. You can’t change history and even Ken has a link that confirms that older chart.
littlerobbergirl: And you’re ignoring the fact that the Medieval Period is portrayed as being warmer either way according to both charts regardless because?? (I don’t think your that dumb not to notice that either.)
Best answer:
Answer by Bob
THEY DON’T alter the scientists work significantly, and the minor edits alter it in the other direction than you suggest.
Neither of your links represents the IPCC’s latest report. That clearly shows the MWP, and it clearly shows it was less than today’s temperatures.
http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:1000_Year_Temperature_Comparison_png
The chart you show saying that the MWP was 10 degrees warmer than now (and claiming that it came from the 1995 IPCC report) is clearly absurd. That would have melted Antarctica, and flooded coasts everywhere. I doubt VERY much it actually came from the IPCC, even 13 (!) years ago.
Actually, the political edits of the IPCC’s work go the OPPOSITE way from what you’re suggesting. The last draft of the scientists said it was 99% certain that global warming was mostly caused by us. The political edit changed that to 95%. Not much of a change, but in the WRONG DIRECTION for your argument. Much more about that here:
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2007/04/10/the-real-climate-censorship/
EDIT – That last cite shows the MWP as being approximately as warm as today. AND IT’S TWENTY YEARS OLD. Sure I’ll believe that 20 years ago, the IPCC data was different by 1/2 degree or so. The MWP graph cited originally claiming the MWP was TEN degrees warmer is still complete nonsense. And looking at a 20 year old graph is hardly thoughtfully looking at the global warming science of today. We’ve gotten a LOT better data in the last 20 years.
EDIT 2 – Science moves on, and the data gets better. A very natural thing. It’s why the Bush Administration has been forced to acknowledge manmade global warming, the scientific data is just too overwhelming. These guys too:
“Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich challenged fellow conservatives to stop resisting scientific evidence of global warming”
“National Review (the most prestigious conservative magazine) published a cover story calling on conservatives to shake off denial and get into the climate policy debate”
“Pat Robertson (very conservative Christian leader) ‘It is getting hotter and the ice caps are melting and there is a build up of carbon dioxide in the air. We really need to do something on fossil fuels.”
“I believe there is now more than enough evidence of climate change to warrant an immediate and comprehensive – but considered – response. Anyone who disagrees is, in my view, still in denial.”
Ford Motor Company CEO William Clay Ford, Jr.
“The science of global warming is clear. We know enough to act now. We must act now.”
James Rogers, CEO of Charlotte-based Duke Energy.
Add your own answer in the comments!
]]>London, February 13 (ANI): A pharmacy in Estonia, which opened its doors in 1422, statements to have a wonder drug for individuals having difficulties with damaged hearts.
The Raeapteek drug keep, in the funds of Tallinn, alleges 1 dose of its almond-primarily based concoction, priced at just one particular euro, can correct the “really like discomfort”.
“Considering that the Center Ages a specific marzipan prescription has been ready and marketed the following for the heart to relieve the ache of really like,” the Telegraph quoted Ulle Noodapera, a pharmacist at the drug, as declaring.he additional: “We maintain creating the particular marzipan since the want for this kind of a medication has continued over the generations, and sufferers with signs or symptoms of enjoy ache maintain turning up looking for the heal.” (ANI)
http://in.news.yahoo.com/139/20100213/882/twl-medieval-european-pharmacy-provides-cu.html
Best solution:
Reply by Mayfair Calling
I suppose it is doable, but I will not feel it is likely. It is possibly a placebo impact.
Add your very own reply in the responses!
]]>you know these medieval knights dressed up in all that armor(seeking great). did that armor truly protect them? i indicate i saw some photos and swords spears arrows had went via them like scorching knife by means of butter. is that why Muslims owned them before ? due to the fact they really manufactured armor that was supplied adequate safety and permitted the soldiers to move more less difficult?
Very best reply:
Solution by Krunchee
Armor was great protection. Mitigation, not invincibility, is the genuine function of armor. A fatal blow may possibly be lowered to a wound, or a wounding blow may do nothing at all. Armor has never been designed to make a warrior completely invulnerable to hurt on the battlefield, it can be often been a trade off amongst protection and mobility.
Create your very own reply in the feedback!
]]>This man just isn’t genuinely all that into Renaissance Faire life. Genuinely, he just thinks the hat and eye put on a jaunty.
Picture by colorblindPICASO
An early shot from back when I was just learning to perform with depth of subject and "interesting" framing. I like what I did with the track record blur but I want I’d managed to get much more of the glass in body.
Obnoxious
Picture by Vagabond Shutterbug
I wonder how considerably they paid this bad man to put on this costume?